In Gellert v. Coltec Indus., Inc., the Delaware Bankruptcy Court held that the ordinary course of business defense under 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(2)(A) can be applied on a motion to dismiss, and that a transfer cannot be constructively fraudulent when payment of the transfer resulted in a dollar-for-dollar satisfaction of an antecedent debt.

On November 1, 2012, the Delaware Department of Finance promulgated a final regulation, effective December 1, 2012, that shortens the look-back period for currently ongoing Delaware unclaimed property audits.

In Liberty Brands, LLC v. Feit, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss the plaintiff-trustee’s claims to recover unauthorized post-petition transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 549.

In Feeley v. NHAOCG, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed several important issues regarding the validity of actions taken in violation of a Delaware limited liability company's operating agreement.

According to the Delaware Division of Corporations' website, more than 980,000 business entities are currently formed under Delaware law, including more than half of all publicly traded U.S. companies and more than 63 percent of the Fortune 500.

In a recent decision in In re Tropicana Entertainment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the denial of a substantial contribution claim filed by the Ad Hoc Consortium of Senior Subordinated Noteholders.

Appellants must justify the need for staying a court’s decision on four criteria, and here, the Third Circuit found that the burden was not met for any of them.

In In re Appraisal of Orchard Enterprises, Inc., the Court of Chancery, in a post-trial decision, determined that the petitioners, certain common stockholders of The Orchard Enterprises, Inc., were entitled to $4.67 per share, rather than the $2.05 per share they received in a going-private transaction.

In Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Vulcan Materials Co., the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery’s decision enjoining Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. from taking any action in connection with its hostile takeover bid for Vulcan Materials Co., including proceeding with its exchange offer and prosecuting its proxy contest, for a period of four months, in order to remedy Martin’s breach of two confidentiality agreements between the companies.

In Zucker v. Andreessen, the Court of Chancery applied the heightened pleading burden under Court of Chancery Rule 23.1 and dismissed a derivative complaint for failure properly to allege demand futility.