CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Fox: Delaware Supreme Court Defers to the Court of Chancery’s Factual Findings and Affirms Holding that Corporation Breached its Stock Option Plan

In CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037 (2016), the Delaware Supreme Court, applying a “clearly erroneous” standard of review, deferred to the Court of Chancery’s findings of fact and upheld the Court of Chancery’s determination that a corporation breached its stock option plan in connection with a spinoff and merger transaction. Caris Life Sciences,…

In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Delaware Derivative Litigation: Court of Chancery Finds Delaware Plaintiffs Collaterally Estopped from Arguing Demand Futility

In In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Delaware Derivative Litigation, 2016 WL 2908344 (Del. Ch. May 13, 2016), the Court of Chancery, applying Arkansas law, held that plaintiff stockholders were precluded from arguing demand futility in a derivative action filed in Delaware because the same issue had already been fully litigated and decided in an Arkansas court…

From The Hague to Timbuktu: The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi; A Consequential Case of Firsts for Cultural Heritage and for the International Criminal Court

This Note presents a wide-ranging legal, political, and strategic examination of the International Criminal Court and its successful landmark prosecution of Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi in late 2016. The unprecedented Al Mahdi case furthers the mission and power of the international community to protect cultural heritage, prevent crimes against humanity, and prevent war crimes,…

Office Tenant’s Pre-Signing Checklist

This Checklist outlines issues a tenant shouldconsider before signing its office lease. ThisChecklist also provides useful information for atenant negotiating its office lease. This Checklistdoes not address relevant state and local law.State and local laws may require additionalmatters to be considered by the tenant before itfinalizes its lease, but the information containedin this resource is useful…

El Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C. v. Brinckerhoff: Delaware Supreme Court Holds Limited Partner’s Claims Challenging MLP Dropdowns Are Derivative and Were Extinguished by Merger

 In El Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C. v. Brinckerhoff, No. 103, 2016 (Del. Dec. 20, 2016), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s holding that a limited partner maintained standing to pursue his claims challenging a dropdown transaction after the limited partnership was acquired by merger.  The Supreme Court rejected the Chancery Court’s holding that the plaintiff’s claims arose out of a breach of the partnership agreement and, therefore, were direct in nature.  As the claims were derivative, they passed to the buyer in the merger, thereby extinguishing the plaintiff’s standing.