Arbitration in the Delaware Court of Chancery
On January 5, 2010, the Court of Chancery adopted new rules providing for Chancery arbitration pursuant to a Delaware statute permitting Delaware’s Chancery judges to act as private arbitrators.
On January 5, 2010, the Court of Chancery adopted new rules providing for Chancery arbitration pursuant to a Delaware statute permitting Delaware’s Chancery judges to act as private arbitrators.
On May 19, 2011, Governor Markell signed Senate Bill No. 9, as amended. This legislation prohibits the Delaware Department of Transportation from accepting as a public street certain roads that will connect to an existing road system in a community restricted to age 55 or older.
Recently, Delaware Governor Jack Markell signed the Civil Union and Equality Act of 2011 legalizing civil unions for same-sex couples in the state.
The Delaware judicial system consists of the Supreme Court, Court of Chancery, Superior Court, Family Court, Court of Common Pleas and Justice of the Peace Courts.
Despite the abundance of case law, whether Revlon applies in any given case remains the subject of much debate. While the Delaware Supreme Court has not had occasion to address the issue, the Delaware Court of Chancery is beginning to apply Revlon’s heightened reasonableness review more frequently in mixed-consideration transactions.
In two recent decisions, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court rejected the imposition of WARN Act liability on corporations affiliated with debtors.
In the last few months, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware has issued a number of decisions of note in the intellectual property area.
Judge Stark Denies Motions for Summary Judgment In Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., C.A. No. 08-862-LPS (D. Del. Mar. 14, 2011), Judge Stark denied defendant Facebook, Inc.’s motions for summary judgment of non-infringement and for invalidity based on anticipation and the on-sale bar. The Court concluded that the parties’ expert witnesses advanced detailed and…
Judge Stark Denies Intervenor’s Motion for Reconsideration or Reargument In LD Display Co., Ltd. V. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 06-726-LPS (D. Del. Feb. 14, 2011), Judge Stark denied intervenor Anvik Corporation’s motion to reconsider an order that denied its request to modify the protective order to allow Anvik access to certain sealed…
Chief Judge Sleet Denies Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue In Apple Inc. v. High Tech Computer Corp., et al., C.A. No. 10-544-GMS (D. Del. Jan. 18, 2011), Apple Inc. filed a patent infringement action against High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a HTC Corp., HTC (B.V.I.) Corp., HTC America, Inc. and Exedea, Inc. (collectively, “HTC”) alleging that…