Judge Davis Dismisses Implied Covenant Claim, but Allows Contract Claims to Proceed Despite the Contract’s Purported Limitation on Damages

In WSFS Financial Corporation and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Great American Insurance Company, C.A. No. N18C-09-088 EMD [CCLD], Judge Davis granted in part and denied in part the defendant’s partial motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ breach of contract and implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims. The action arose from an insurance…

Judge LeGrow Analyzes Stock Purchase Agreement and Dismisses Claims Related to Breach of Non-Solicitation Clause due to Plaintiff’s Failure to Plead Affiliate Status

In P&TI Acquisition Company, Inc., v. Morgenthaler Partners VII, LP, et al., C.A. No. N18C-08-059 AML [CCLD], Judge LeGrow dismissed breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims against all defendants. This case stemmed from the plaintiff’s purchase of PhilTem Holdings, Inc. from the defendants in 2012 under…

Judge Johnston Concludes Vague Allegations of “Illegal Activity” Are Insufficient under Delaware’s Pleading Standards and Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Claim Is Duplicative of Contract Claim

In West v. Access Control Related Enterprises, LLC, et al, C.A. No. N17C-11-137 MMJ [CCLD], Judge Johnston granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss. The case arose from the termination of William West, CFO and COO of Access Control Related Enterprises, LLC (“ACRE”). Prior to West’s termination, LLR Equity Partners (“LLR”) purchased…

Complex Commercial Litigation Update

In the second quarter of 2019, the CCLD judges handled numerous contract cases and, in a series of opinions, reinforced that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing should be applied “sparingly.” There was also a multi-week jury trial in a case involving a dispute over a business acquisition.

Perfecting a Security Interest in the Assets of a Series of a Delaware LLC or LP

For a number of years, the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “LLC Act”) has permitted Delaware limited liability companies (“LLCs”) to establish designated series of members, managers, limited liability company interests or assets. In 2007, the LLC Act was amended to provide series the power and capacity to, in their own names, enter into contracts,…

Marchand v. Barnhill: Addressing and Monitoring Corporate Risk

Stockholder plaintiffs generally face a high burden insurviving a motion to dismiss on so-called Caremarkclaims challenging the board’s compliance with its dutyof oversight. A recent Delaware Supreme Court opinionillustrates the circumstances in which a plaintiff makinga Caremark claim may withstand a motion to dismiss.It also provides guidance on implementing and monitoringsystems and controls to…

Calling the Cavalry: Special Purpose Directors in Times of Boardroom Stress

Over the last three decades, the demands placed on public company directors have increased exponentially. In addition to ordinary course audit committee, compensation committee, compliance and business oversight work, directors are now expected to animate the company’s sustainability programs, focus a keen eye on boardroom diversity and “refreshment,” understand cyber and other enterprise risks, and assure…

Chancery Addresses Director Compensation Under ‘Investors Bancorp’ in ‘Stein’

In Stein v. Blankfein, C.A. No. 2017-0354-SG (Del. Ch. May 31), the Delaware Court of Chancery issued one of its firstopinions addressing director compensation following the Delaware Supreme Court’s ruling in In re Investors BancorpStockholder Litigation, 177 A.3d 1208 (Del. 2017), that stockholder approval of a compensation plan may only “ratify”future director awards if the board…

Precluding Pre-Merger Communications in Post-Merger Dispute

In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, C.A. No. 2018-0517-KSJM (Del. Ch. May 29, 2019), the Delaware Court of Chancery upheld a provision in a private-company merger agreement precluding a buyer from using the seller’s privileged emails against the seller in post-closing litigation. Following the guidance from the decision in Great Hill Equity Partners