Cigna Health & Life Insurance Company v. Audax Health Solutions, Inc.: Court of Chancery Invalidates Claims Release and Indemnification Provisions in Private Company Merger

In Cigna Health & Life Insurance Company v. Audax Health Solutions, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery found invalid features of a private company merger agreement that required stockholders, as a condition to receiving their merger consideration, to submit a letter of transmittal agreeing to provide a release of all claims against the acquirer and that further required stockholders to indemnify, for an indefinite period of time, the acquirer for claims arising from the seller's breach of representations and warranties.

Delaware Bankruptcy Court Rules in Antecedent Debt Case

Can a plaintiff state a preference claim by generally alleging that one or more of the debtor entities made the transfer at issue on account of an antecedent debt? The Delaware Bankruptcy Court (the Honorable Mary F. Walrath, presiding) recently reminded plaintiffs that the answer is no. See Stanziale v. DMJ Gas-Marketing Consultants, LLC. In

Delaware Real Estate Law Update: Reauthorization of Terrorism Risk Insurance Act

On January 8, the United States Senate passed H.R. 26, the “Terrorism Risk Insurance Program and Reauthorization Act of 2015,” which had already passed in the House of Representatives the previous day. The bill will now go to the President for his signature. The legislation extends by six years the terrorism insurance program, which has been…

Worldwide Accountability: The WTO’s Failure To Create an Infrastructure that Delivers Pharmaceutical Drugs to Developing Countries

In response to the public outcry over the death of millions of people in developing countries because of a lack of access to life-saving drugs, the World Trade Organization (WTO) recognized the need for developing countries to obtain pharmaceutical drugs at a reduced rate. However, the WTO received significant pushback from patent holders and pharmaceutical companies…

The Rights and Duties of Blockholder Directors

Delaware corporate law embraces a “board-centric” model of governance contemplatingthat, as a general matter, all directors will participate in a collective and deliberativedecision-making process. Rather than serving as a justification for a board majority to disempowerdirectors elected or appointed by or at the direction of a particular class or seriesof stock or an insurgent group—which we…

Recent Chancery Court Guidance on Rule 5.1

Parties resisting a challenge to the confidential treatment of documents under Delaware Court of Chancery Rule5.1(f) must offer individualized, contemporaneous good cause for such treatment to ensure that confidentialitydesignations are maintained throughout litigation. For older documents, that showing must overcome a presumptionof “staleness” under Rule 5.1(f).…