C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. City of Miami General Employees’ and Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust: Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Entry of Mandatory Preliminary Injunction

In C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. City of Miami General Employees' and Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s decision to grant an “unusual” 30-day preliminary injunction of the merger between C&J Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and a division of Nabors Industries Ltd., a Bermuda company.

Recent Chancery Court Opinions on Ripeness

The Delaware Court of Chancery's ruling in Pontiac General Employees Retirement System v. Ballantine, is the most recent statement on so-called "dead hand" proxy puts—the provisions in credit agreements that trigger an acceleration of the borrower's indebtedness upon a change in amajority of its board within a specified timeframe.

Delaware Bankruptcy Court Denies Motion to Convert

Under a memorandum order dated October 23, 2014, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a party’s request to have the debtors’ chapter 11 cases converted to chapter 7 cases. While sympathetic to the movant’s request, the court ultimately determined that the relevant parties were making some progress toward the goal of a plan of reorganization and therefore…

District Court Considers Post-Octane Fitness Fee Awards

In Octane Fitness LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, the U.S. Supreme Court evaluated the language in 35 U.S.C. Section 285, a statute that allows for the award of attorney fees to prevailing parties in "exceptional" patent infringement cases, and rejected a restrictive interpretation of the statute by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Third Circuit Rejects Estoppel Finding and Reverses Order Compelling Arbitration

On October 9, 2014, in Flintkote Co. v. Aviva PLC, No. 13-4055, the Third Circuit reversed an order holding on an estoppel theory that an insurer was required to arbitrate even though it had no written arbitration agreement with the debtor. The Third Circuit held that the debtor had not presented clear and convincing proof that…