Chief Judge Stark Invalidates Patent Under Section 101
In American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, No. 15-1168-LPS (D. Del. Feb. 27, 2018), Chief Judge Stark granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity, holding that two representative claims of the patent at issue were not directed to patentable subject matter. The patent at issue was directed to damping various types…
Chief Judge Stark Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Grants Motion to Dismiss Indirect Infringement and Willfulness
In Oil Lift Technology Inc. v. Millennium Oilflow Systems & Technology Inc., No. 17-1212-LPS-CJB (D. Del. Apr. 10, 2018), Chief Judge Stark denied Oil Lift Technology Inc.’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the defendants, Millennium Oilflow Systems & Technology Inc. and MOST Oil USA Inc., and granted in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss claims…
Magistrate Judge Burke Permits Deposition of Claim Construction Declarant
In Astellas Pharma Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC, No. 16-905-JFB-CJB (D. Del. Feb. 27, 2018), Magistrate Judge Burke granted the defendants’ request to depose an expert who submitted a declaration regarding indefiniteness (among other issues) in support of the plaintiffs’ opening claim construction brief. The defendants sought to depose the expert before submitting their sur-reply claim…
New Limitations on Eminent Domain
On April 17, 2018, Delaware Governor John Carney signed into law House Bill No. 144 (as amended). This new legislation has three effects. First, it expressly limits the Delaware Department of Transportation’s acquisition of property to specified transportation-related needs. Second, greater limitations are imposed on acquisitions in advance of approved, final right-of-way plans. Finally, the new…
Judge Carpenter Considers Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Provision and Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Inducement Claims
In DecisivEdge, LLC v. VNU Group, LLC, C.A. No. N17C-05-584-WCC-CCLD, Judge Carpenter granted in part and denied in part the defendant’s motion to dismiss claims for, inter alia, breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. The dispute arose out of the plaintiff’s agreement to provide technology services to the defendant. The parties had entered into a series…
Judge Johnston Grants Motion to Dismiss in Case Arising from Embezzlement Scheme
In Continental Finance Company, LLC v. TD Bank, N.A., C.A. No. N17C-07-002 MMJ CCLD, Judge Johnston granted a motion to dismiss a negligence case arising out of an embezzlement scheme perpetuated by a non-party. Plaintiff Continental Finance Company, LLC sued defendant TD Bank, N.A. for negligence and alleged that TD Bank negligently failed to detect an…
Judge Davis Considers Issues of Collateral Estoppel in Insurance Coverage Dispute Resulting from Court of Chancery Litigation
In Arch Insurance Co. v. David H. Murdock, C.A. No. N16C-01-104 EMD CCLD, Judge Davis granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff insurers’ motion for summary judgment arguing that the insurers did not have a duty to indemnify the insureds. This dispute arose in connection with a settlement agreement reached in In re Dole…
Judge Carpenter Grants Motion to Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim after Finding Defendant Presented the Only Reasonable Interpretation of Contractual Language
In Equity Trust Company v. Interactive Brokers LLC, C.A. No. N17C-05-252 WCC CCLD, Judge Carpenter granted a motion to dismiss after finding that the defendant’s interpretation was the only reasonable interpretation of the contractual agreement at issue. The dispute arose out of an agreement executed in 2000 between defendant Interactive Brokers LLC and Delaware Charter Guarantee…
Special Discovery Master Resolves Discovery Issues Concerning Sufficiency of Document Production and Contention Interrogatories
In Imorphics Ltd. v. THINK Surgical, Inc., C.A. No. N16C-09-149-MMJ-CCLD, a special discovery master was tasked with resolving cross-motions to compel. The plaintiffs’ motion argued that the defendant, THINK Surgical, Inc., failed to sufficiently respond to certain interrogatories and requests for production. Specifically, the plaintiffs requested THINK to identify and quantify all damages it claimed to…
Complex Commercial Litigation Update
In the first quarter of 2018, the Delaware Superior Court’s Complex Commercial Litigation Division considered a number of disputes arising from contractual agreements and addressed issues ranging from the enforceability of liquidated damages provisions to whether termination fees are payable in the event a contract is not renewed.