Chief Judge Stark Denies Motion to Enter Final Judgment
In Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc., C.A. No. 12-540-LPS (D. Del. March 16, 2018), Chief Judge Stark denied Power Integrations, Inc.’s motion for entry of final judgment. After an eight-day jury trial in 2015, in which the parties asserted patents against each other, the jury found that, inter alia, the plaintiffs, Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation…
Magistrate Judge Burke Permits Deposition of Claim Construction Declarant
In Astellas Pharma Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC, No. 16-905-JFB-CJB (D. Del. Feb. 27, 2018), Magistrate Judge Burke granted the defendants’ request to depose an expert who submitted a declaration regarding indefiniteness (among other issues) in support of the plaintiffs’ opening claim construction brief. The defendants sought to depose the expert before submitting their sur-reply claim…
Chief Judge Stark Invalidates Patent Under Section 101
In American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, No. 15-1168-LPS (D. Del. Feb. 27, 2018), Chief Judge Stark granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity, holding that two representative claims of the patent at issue were not directed to patentable subject matter. The patent at issue was directed to damping various types…
Magistrate Judge Fallon Denies Motion to Compel Deposition and Production of Communications with Third-Party Deponent
In Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 15-542-JFB-SRF (D. Del. Feb. 16, 2018), and related actions, Magistrate Judge Fallon denied Evolved Wireless, LLC’s motion to compel defendants in these cases to produce communications with third party Qualcomm, Inc. regarding topics on which Qualcomm had been deposed. Defendants in these actions had earlier raised a license…
New Limitations on Eminent Domain
On April 17, 2018, Delaware Governor John Carney signed into law House Bill No. 144 (as amended). This new legislation has three effects. First, it expressly limits the Delaware Department of Transportation’s acquisition of property to specified transportation-related needs. Second, greater limitations are imposed on acquisitions in advance of approved, final right-of-way plans. Finally, the new…
Judge Johnston Grants Motion to Dismiss in Case Arising from Embezzlement Scheme
In Continental Finance Company, LLC v. TD Bank, N.A., C.A. No. N17C-07-002 MMJ CCLD, Judge Johnston granted a motion to dismiss a negligence case arising out of an embezzlement scheme perpetuated by a non-party. Plaintiff Continental Finance Company, LLC sued defendant TD Bank, N.A. for negligence and alleged that TD Bank negligently failed to detect an…
Complex Commercial Litigation Update
In the first quarter of 2018, the Delaware Superior Court’s Complex Commercial Litigation Division considered a number of disputes arising from contractual agreements and addressed issues ranging from the enforceability of liquidated damages provisions to whether termination fees are payable in the event a contract is not renewed.
Judge Carpenter Considers Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Provision and Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Inducement Claims
In DecisivEdge, LLC v. VNU Group, LLC, C.A. No. N17C-05-584-WCC-CCLD, Judge Carpenter granted in part and denied in part the defendant’s motion to dismiss claims for, inter alia, breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. The dispute arose out of the plaintiff’s agreement to provide technology services to the defendant. The parties had entered into a series…
Judge Carpenter Grants Motion to Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim after Finding Defendant Presented the Only Reasonable Interpretation of Contractual Language
In Equity Trust Company v. Interactive Brokers LLC, C.A. No. N17C-05-252 WCC CCLD, Judge Carpenter granted a motion to dismiss after finding that the defendant’s interpretation was the only reasonable interpretation of the contractual agreement at issue. The dispute arose out of an agreement executed in 2000 between defendant Interactive Brokers LLC and Delaware Charter Guarantee…
Special Discovery Master Resolves Discovery Issues Concerning Sufficiency of Document Production and Contention Interrogatories
In Imorphics Ltd. v. THINK Surgical, Inc., C.A. No. N16C-09-149-MMJ-CCLD, a special discovery master was tasked with resolving cross-motions to compel. The plaintiffs’ motion argued that the defendant, THINK Surgical, Inc., failed to sufficiently respond to certain interrogatories and requests for production. Specifically, the plaintiffs requested THINK to identify and quantify all damages it claimed to…