An Effort To Untangle Efforts Standards Under Delaware Law

In today’s business world, where contracts between corporations areheavily negotiated and contracting parties are, generally, strictly boundby the terms agreed to in those contracts, most contracting parties feelthat including standards to delineate the effort each party must put intoupholding the terms of the contract is absolutely critical. Thesestandards, known as “efforts standards,” vary and include “good…

Chief Judge Stark Denies Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions

In IBM Corp. v. Groupon, Inc., No. 16-122-LPS (D. Del. Nov. 1, 2017), Chief Judge Stark denied the plaintiff’s motion to strike certain of the defendant’s invalidity contentions, since the references were disclosed before or on the deadline for the close of fact discovery and sufficient time remained to cure any prejudice without disrupting the trial…

Judge Andrews Stays Case Pending ex Parte Re-Examination

In Waters Technologies Corp. v. Aurora SFC Systems, Inc., No. 11-708-RGA (D. Del. Nov. 13, 2017), Judge Andrews granted the defendant’s motion to stay pending ex parte re-examination. A scheduling conference had taken place a week before this decision, the motion was filed before the trial date was put in place, and the examiner’s finding…

Magistrate Judge Fallon Denies Motion to Dismiss as Moot

In Telebrands Corp. v. 1ByOne Products Inc., No. 17-997-JFB-SRF (D. Del. Nov. 21, 2017), Magistrate Judge Fallon denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim as moot. After moving to dismiss, the defendant answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of the two asserted patents…

Magistrate Judge Fallon Recommends Court Transfer Action Because of Improper Venue

In Treehouse Avatar LLC v. Valve Corp., No. 15-427-JFB-SRF (D. Del. Nov. 20, 2017), Magistrate Judge Fallon recommended that the Court grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss or transfer the action to the Western District of Washington, where the defendant, Valve Corp., is incorporated and maintains its headquarters. Valve alleged that venue was improper in the…

Chief Judge Stark Denies Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue with Leave to Renew Following Venue Discovery

In Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories Ltd., No. 16-224-LPS (D. Del. Dec. 1, 2017), Chief Judge Stark denied a motion to dismiss or transfer for improper venue filed by the defendants, Mylan Laboratories Limited, Mylan, Inc., and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Mylan”), but with leave to renew after the plaintiffs, Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hospira, Inc.,…

Chief Judge Stark Rules on Proceedings for Venue Discovery

In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc., No. 17-374-LPS (D. Del. Nov. 28, 2017), and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 17-379-LPS (D. Del. Nov. 28, 2017), Chief Judge Stark set forth the procedures for venue-related discovery on defendant Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s motion to dismiss for improper venue. The Court ordered Mylan…

Judge Andrews Denies Request to Strike Daubert Briefing

In B. Braun Melsungen AG v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., No. 16-411-RGA (D. Del. Dec. 5, 2017), Judge Andrews refused a request to strike the plaintiffs’ Daubert briefing for having an excessive number of pages. The plaintiffs had filed three Daubert motions, each accompanied by a 20-page brief. Judge Andrews acknowledged that he has…