Delaware Corporate Newsletter

In the past few months, the Delaware courts have issued several opinions that raise important issues for Delaware corporations and their advisors.

The Shops Are Open: Delaware’s New Take on Go-Shop Provisions under Revlon

In three recent cases, the Delaware Chancery Court provides significant guidance regarding the review and effectiveness of “go shop” provisions, which generally permit target boards of directors to solicit competing bids for a specified period of time following the execution of a merger agreement.…

Desimone v. Barrows

Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Derivative Complaint Alleging Stock Option Backdating

Delaware Law Developments: Stock Option Backdating and Spring-Loading

In Recent Opinions, the Delaware Court of Chancery Has Denied Motions to Dismiss Stockholder Complaints that Directors Who Approved Backdated or Spring-Loaded Options Had Breached Their Fiduciary Duties to their Corporations and Stockholders. The Authors Discuss These Cases and Review Other Possible Challenges to Option Grants under Delaware Law.…

Section 546(c) and Reclamation Rights after BAPCPA: A Response to Wilson and LeHane

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court may have the occasion to consider additional reclamation-related issues in the AMS case. The court recently approved the debtors’ request for certain uniform procedures for its consideration of all reclamation claims, pursuant to which the debtors are required to file a written report with the court proposing specific treatment for each…

A Measured Response to Critics of Delaware Venue

Some have argued recently that Delawareis no longer the “knee jerk” forum of choice for bankruptcy filings. The argument is that recent Third Circuit rulingson substantive consolidation, the absolute priority rule and “deepening insolvency” make the Southern District of New York the better venue choice over Delaware. As discussed below, these criticisms fail to carefully analyze…

Proving Solvency: Defending Preference and Fraudulent Transfer Litigation

Litigating solvency can be a complicated endeavor. This article provides a general road map for proving solvency in the defense of preference and fraudulent transfer litigation. The three common measures of solvency are discussed: the “balance sheet” test; the “unreasonably small capital” test; and the “ability to pay debts” test. The article also provides practical suggestions…